| ??? 03/01/10 07:13 Read: times |
#173668 - Why do people assume the costly cumbersome protocols? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
What's the matter with those $5 transceivers at 434 Khz that one sees from time to time?
Why would someone want to use a fancy-protocol-based module, most of the features of which are wasted if one wants merely to send or receive a signal once or twice a minute from the remote end of the link? RE |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| wireless data transmission ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Insufficient detail! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Let us have more details, please. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What wireless tranceivers/modules? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why do people assume the costly cumbersome protocols? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I think you mean MHz ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, you're right ... I must have gone to sleep ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Wireless data transmission | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| IS YOUR RF DESIGN RELIABLE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| digial mdulation scheme before RF ASK modulation? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hmmm no reply tomy questions? | 01/01/70 00:00 |