| ??? 03/10/10 00:36 Read: times |
#173964 - Why not address his question instead of wasting more money? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I imagine I'd do such a thing if you'd pay for the new display.
In the meantime I think it would be more appropriate to try to solve the O/P's problem rather than giving him a new one. What he wants to do is "doable" and probably with code already in the 8052.cOM code library. RE |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Display problems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| forgot to mention! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| read the datasheet and buy the iron | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| just a minute ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If you can't "afford" the one pin for the R/W signal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why not address his question instead of wasting more money? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| odd behaviour | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Magic? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| oscilloscope is fine, but in this case... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Both, I think | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "magic" is synonym for "luck" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| working | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| min & max limits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Delay lengths | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
If only folks would do what we once always did ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RW pin is defined but | 01/01/70 00:00 |