??? 03/29/10 22:52 Read: times |
#174610 - Interesting, but missing the point surely... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
The point I was trying to make was that as far as I can see there's no way 'finished' could ever be set, because that would require servicing the LightGate2 interrupt whilst already servicing the Timer interrupt. |
Topic | Author | Date |
Timer Problem Assembly Code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Interrupt priorities... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Also... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The missing words | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You sure? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
many ways to skin a cat | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Actually very relevant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
My impression is | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Interesting, but missing the point surely... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Interrupts are 'saved' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Soft interrupts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
in a '51 forum | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Still missing the point... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the missing reti's have already been mentioned | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Apart from missing reti...![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Interupt priorities | 01/01/70 00:00 |