| ??? 05/17/10 07:20 Read: times |
#175957 - RE: "I think" Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Neil Kurzman said:
I think... You may well be right - but only Hendryawan can confirm (or deny) that! The problem of relating physical location to device-ID has been discussed here before; The Maxim/Dallas address discovery algorithm lets you determine the "identities" of the devices - but not their physical locations. There is now a variant of the DS18B20 1-Wire sensor which incorporates additional facilities for identifying physical location. I forget the part number - see the Maxim website... |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| multi DS18B20 problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Please explain! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Need a concept | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "I think" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| device ID vs sensor location | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Threat?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I had a thought once of a device ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| They have two eeprom locations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that, I realized, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| *replacements* are not so bad | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 1-Wire: problem of relating physical location to device-ID | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
my problem solved | 01/01/70 00:00 |