| ??? 08/13/10 15:53 Read: times |
#177990 - but Responding to: ???'s previous message |
the sequence is still random
Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| the "interrupt priority list" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| latency calculation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Do I understand this correctly... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| priority (IP) and 'polling sequence" (the chip) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how to interpret "interrupts occuring at the same time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sequence can't be influenced | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no, it is 'random' because .. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
latency calculation | 01/01/70 00:00 |