| ??? 09/12/10 14:27 Read: times |
#178522 - A suggestion Responding to: ???'s previous message |
See the other comments about properly defining your requirements.
But, whatever you do, I would suggest that you consider a modular approach - rather than try to do all 450 (or whatever) in one fell swoop... |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| I/O pin extension | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Start by specify your need | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you really have to list down the full requirements | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A suggestion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Specefic Requirements | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why relays? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| But dot matrix printers normally don't have X*Y array head | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Only need *one* column of dots! [ED] | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Head has constant speed w/o steps even with stepper motors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reply | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not helpful! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Necessity of relays | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Relays are not necessary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What's a "design"? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Discrete or integrated | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| So what's the reason for a slow ctar-at-a-time head? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Printer Purpose | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Still no specific reason for a matrix! [Ed] | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| More care while finding solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "many others" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Smaller than a relay | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Relays Take Drivers Too | 01/01/70 00:00 |