| ??? 01/11/11 07:34 Read: times |
#180510 - version revisited Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Just reporting that tried the null pointer stuff on a freshly downloaded SDCC snapshot and it failed in the same way as in the OP.
SDCC run on the example with "indexed null pointer" said: c:Program Filessdcc.NIbintmp>sdcc --version SDCC : mcs51/gbz80/z80/ds390/pic16/pic14/TININative/ds400/hc08 3.0.1 #6092 (Jan 10 2011) (MINGW32) c:Program Filessdcc.NIbintmp>sdcc i.c i.c:3: error 9: FATAL Compiler Internal Error in file '/home/sdcc-builder/build/sdcc-build/orig/sdcc/src/SDCCicode.c' line number '2865' : code generator internal error Contact Author with source code Internal error: validateLink failed in DCL_TYPE(ptr) @ /home/sdcc-builder/build/sdcc-build/orig/sdcc/src/SDCCicode.c:2813: expected DECLARATOR, got SPECIFIER c:Program Filessdcc.NIbintmp> |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| sdcc internal error / C syntax | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| legality of indexing NULL pointer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| bug | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| version | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| version revisited | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thank you | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Fixed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no snapshot | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| works | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 0 is special - but so is NULL. indexing around NULL is bad | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No guarantee that a NULL pointer points to any memory | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I know :-( | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Use of __at ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What is "that way"? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the antique version.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| XBYTE macro | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Okay, then the following definition... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: David's remarks about volatility | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Close, but no cigar | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Avoid the 'volatile' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| instead of offsetting... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Dereferencing a '_REG | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Use of __at ? [ed] | 01/01/70 00:00 |