| upcoming AT89LP chips | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Interesting.. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| MCS-251 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I wouldn't hold my breath ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Why bother waiting? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Says who? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| says me! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Doing oneself a favour? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| RE: Tie-ins | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Yes,but... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Who else manufactures '51 in PDIL40 at low cost? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Nobody can beat STC in the field of low cost 8051 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Nice link | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| yes so fast | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Nice stuff in PDIL 40 aswell eh! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Low cost DIP's.. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Who uses DIPs? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| The hobbyist connection.. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Things to like | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Free Tools.. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| ARM | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Re: ARM | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Intel | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Never did | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| it wasn't always like that | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| actively promoting the core? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| things were different then ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| define "abandoned" | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Managers | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Re: Intel | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| actually, Intel *used to make* ARMs... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I know.. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Loved the efficient 68k emulation in newer Palms | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Re: 68K virtualisation | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Abandoned | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| intel museum | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| request historical documents | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| what link? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| here | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| wayback machine | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| unfortunately not - in this case | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| ftp://download.intel.com/ | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I've found it increasingly rare ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| museum | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| re: the hobbyist connection | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Re: the hobbyist connection | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| My experience | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Multitude of packages | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| In that case.. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| AVR - only limited DIP availability. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Limited needs for full set of DIL chips | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Unfortunately, there are stumbling blocks | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| "Breadboards" ? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Yes I do, | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Lovely example! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| A thing of beauty, eh? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| What's crazy is that many of these seem to work | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| RE: Check long-term availability of any DIP variants | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| DIP | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| And your point is...? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I'm not convinced that's real reason ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Prototyping methods | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| You can say that again! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Not really | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| You have a point, but... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Have you counted the oscillator? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Look at the package pin-count. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Pin counts | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Haven't seen skinny 40-pin DIL | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I've got to agree | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| high pin-count DIP | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I'm not sure what the constraints were, but ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Oops. I meant 0.6" DIL | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Shrink DIP | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I remember,,, | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Yes, it was 0.9 inches as was that 68000 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| maybe not, but | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Yep,but... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Is it 1998 already? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| something everybody will have to learn to live with | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I'm not so certain of that ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| also disappearing | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Well, once again, I have to agree ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Re: AVR/xmega | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
