| ??? 02/23/11 19:50 Read: times |
#181269 - separate program Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Neil Kurzman said:
Why not make the Bootloader a separate program.
But I agree the Bootloader should not erase itself. A separate program is ideal. I just don't know how to locate it starting at 0x8000, nor how to jump to it, at least from within a C program. Does the Chip have any protection bit? Flash protection? Yes, but the firmware update program necessarily sets those to write-allowed. -a |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Odd use of code banking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I don't know about Keil's... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Seperate Program? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| separate program | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Often special lock bits for boot regions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| linker magic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RTFM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You are not good to go | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| updater and libraries | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| which is why | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Please Reconsider | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the golden rule | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: Reconsider | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
If needed... | 01/01/70 00:00 |