| ??? 09/14/11 19:38 Read: times |
#183764 - re: not fixed yet Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Maarten Brock said:
Andy Peters said:
Apparently, the Actel SoftConsole uses an ancient version of sdcc -- 2.6.3 -- so I wonder if this issue has been addressed in a later version of the compiler? I'll open up a bug in the system regardless; it can always be marked as already solved. I can assure you this is not fixed in any recent version as I checked the source code. OK, good to know. I am looking at odd corner cases again, and as such I'm the only person who's come across this? It wouldn't be the first time. Maarten said:
Andy Peters said:
Now to ask Actel why they use an ancient version of sdcc, and whether I can blithely install a newer one over their installation without the whole thing going to hell. I would wonder especially why they chose to distribute an intermediate snapshot instead of an official release. Very good question. I don't know if it was Actel's choice, or they're just using what CodeSourcery provided. I did open a tech support case with Actel, asking about why they still use such an old version of the compiler, when they'll provide a newer version, and what I can expect to stop working if I upgrade it myself. Their support sucks, so I'll get a non-answer. -a |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| SDCC: function pointers in an ISR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Alternative | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: Alternative | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Register bank 1 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: register bank 1 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Using... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Lack of orthogonality | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| incorrect warning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: incorrect warning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not fixed yet | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: not fixed yet | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Actel's answer. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| warning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| function pointers in SDCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| bug fixed! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Actel support | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Still on the payroll | 01/01/70 00:00 |