| AT89LP51xD2 ... coming? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Sounds brilliant! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Was it AVR who made low-quantity available? Or just spin-off | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Probably true | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Hobbyists and students are really important | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Also... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| That wasn't the only thing ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Assembler | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| 'LP simulator | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Good | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| No ... I doubt he means that ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| That may have been the case, but ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| While that may be the case ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Never used C - planned to but had to settle for half memsize | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| See ... 'C' can make the memory requirement greater | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| But it ain't *necessarily* so | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Yes, that's a valid basis for the choice of 'C' | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Just don't kick in open doors | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Again, you may be totally correct about that ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| sure, and so friggin what if ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| well ... that's not exactly what I did ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| On chip debug | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Why unlikely? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| That's true. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Yes, that's what I meant! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Missed the point! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Ah, sorry. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Single Clocker LP Chips From Atmel | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Samples | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Samples | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Samples | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Samples Not... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| they are good at that | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Atmel says... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Samples Yes!! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Nothing here yet | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| you are not in the US | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| No excuse! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Envelope? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| ... "coming" ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Yet another missed opportunity. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Sorry thought this thread closed ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Now maybe you guys will see why I don't use 'em | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| hard to tell, but... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| They're thrashing about, but ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| why the sigh ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Probably not ... but you never know ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| datasheets | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I'm glad they're there ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Sad, but true. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Too much "designers" | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| it's that old bugaboo ... appearance over substance ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I'd say | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| "The part will only be available in about 3 weeks" | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I've heard/read that comment from them before ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Common with delays for new chips | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Quite so! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I have to remind the public-at-risk | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Again | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| There's a purpose ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I agree with Per !! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Not so, but it probably applies to every one of ATMEL's | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| samples | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I tested... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| The AT89LP4052 works very well | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Looks good, so far, eh? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| A typical op | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| singleclockers | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| impressive | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I will wait and see. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Transistors are cheap | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I can't find that | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Sorry. I thought it was unlikely. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
copy/paste | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| thanks | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Have you received those samples, Andy? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
