| ??? 02/05/02 18:51 Read: times |
#19443 - RE: interrupt driven |
I agree with Erik. Interrupt-driven serial communications is the only way to go.
There is not much additional code required and you will be confident that your software will be able to handle serial data that is received when you might not be expecting it, and you'll also be able to transmit data in the "background" while your program is working on other matters instead of waiting to transmit your data. Craig Steiner |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Which serial transmission method is good | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Which serial transmission method is good | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Which serial transmission method is good | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Which serial transmission method is good | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Which serial transmission method is good | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: interrupt driven | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Which serial transmission method is good | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Which serial transmission method is good | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Which serial transmission method is good | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Which serial transmission method is good | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Which serial transmission method is good | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Which serial transmission method is good | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Which serial transmission method is good | 01/01/70 00:00 |



