Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
05/29/02 13:21
Read: times


 		 #23597 - RE: Keil: if(x & 0x0f == 0) -> dead code
Yes, its a compiler bug of the old version.

On ANSI C rules the comparison "==" was done first and "0x0f==0" was always false. So ANDing with something leave false too.


Peter


List of 7 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Keil: if(x & 0x0f == 0) -> dead code            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Keil: if(x & 0x0f == 0) -> dead code            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Keil: if(x & 0x0f == 0) -> dead code            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Keil: if(x & 0x0f == 0) -> dead code            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Keil: if(x & 0x0f == 0) -> dead code            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Keil: if(x & 0x0f == 0) -> dead code            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Keil: if(x & 0x0f == 0) -> dead code            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List