| ??? 06/02/02 12:33 Read: times |
#23758 - RE: Code optimisation in keil C |
Hi Mahmood,
"If (...) its all working wonderfully and doing what it should do" Then you're work is done! :o) "Do i need to optimize it with assembler or rethink my algorithms to be more efficient?" A bit of both, I should think. In general, I would say that a relatively simple routine that has to be executed lots of times may well benefit from handcoded assembly optimalisation. 'Complex' mathematical routines on the other hand could benefit from a different algorithmic approach, which may be as simple as using integer maths instead of floating point. You will have to decide where there is need for more efficiency in your code and only you can decide where there is room for improvement. "what do the pros think ?" Are you not a pro, then?? ;o) Best regards, Rob. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Code optimisation in keil C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Code optimisation in keil C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Code optimisation in keil C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Code optimisation in keil C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Code optimisation in keil C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Code optimisation in keil C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Code optimisation in keil C / Andy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Code optimisation in keil C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Code optimisation in keil C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Code optimisation in keil C / Andy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Code optimisation in keil C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Code optimisation in keil C | 01/01/70 00:00 |



