| ??? 07/05/02 06:42 Read: times |
#25326 - RE: interrupt at high....Danni |
Hi Peter,
Yes, your method could save an extra inverter IC, but it also uses up a timer along with the hi-to-lo ext interrupt. If a timer cannot be sacrificed, the NOT gate would be a better method. If a spare timer is available, your method makes more sense kundi |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| interrupt at high | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: interrupt at high | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: interrupt at high | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: interrupt at high | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: interrupt at high | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: interrupt at high....Danni | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: interrupt at high....Danni | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: interrupt at high....Danni | 01/01/70 00:00 |



