| ??? 07/17/02 16:54 Read: times |
#25944 - RE: PSEN at P89C51RB2 \ |
I see that now. Didn't notice it before.
And I don't see why anyone would be using the Philips part instead of the Atmel, unless IIC is required. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| PSEN at P89C51RB2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: PSEN at P89C51RB2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: PSEN at P89C51RB2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: PSEN at P89C51RB2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: PSEN at P89C51RB2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: PSEN at P89C51RB2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: PSEN at P89C51RB2 "J" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: PSEN at P89C51RB2 \ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: PSEN at P89C51RB2 \ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: PSEN at P89C51RB2 \ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: PSEN at P89C51RB2 \ | 01/01/70 00:00 |



