| ??? 07/18/02 09:06 Read: times |
#25969 - RE: 8051 RTOS Opinions? |
hi peter;
Peter Dannegger wrote: ------------------------------- On using an RTOS the maximum response time also for the task of the highest priority was still as long as the maximum execution time of any other task independend from its priority. ---------- but that would true only for cooperative scheduling,for pre-emptive scheduling atleast for a single event/interrupt time would be =scheduling time+context switch+delays due to non preemptible kernel portions. from my experience(however little it is) context switch in 8051 architecures is the most time consuming part because of iram-xram architecture. regards pranav |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 8051 RTOS Opinions? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 RTOS Opinions? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 RTOS Opinions? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 RTOS Opinions? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 RTOS Opinions? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 RTOS Opinions? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 RTOS Opinions? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 RTOS Opinions? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 RTOS Opinions? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 RTOS Opinions? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 RTOS Opinions? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 RTOS Opinions? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 8051 RTOS Opinions? | 01/01/70 00:00 |



