Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
08/21/02 18:05
Read: times


 
#27647 - RE: 89C664, Peter
I agree that it was absolutotally stupid that Philips made the boot vector programmable (the excuse is that some might want to vector to their own boot code) since I can't visualize any custom boot that would work off switches.
However, Philips has other advantages and the method I offer makes the boot "vector independent"
The WinIsp program invites mistakes since everything has to be done every time, FlashMagic (paid for by Philips) will "remember" what you want so a typing mistake will not kill you.
Another issue is that, to my best knowledge, Atmel does not offer the 66x functionality.

Viel spass

Erik

List of 14 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
I lost boot vector byte off 89C664            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: I lost boot vector byte off 89C664            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: I lost boot vector byte off 89C664            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: I lost boot vector byte off 89C664            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: I lost boot vector byte off 89C664            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: I lost boot vector byte off 89C664            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: I lost boot vector byte off 89C664            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: I lost boot vector byte off 89C664            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 89C664, Peter            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: I lost boot vector byte off 89C664            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: I lost boot vector byte off 89C664            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 89C664, Peter            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: I lost boot vector byte off 89C664            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: I lost boot vector byte off 89C664            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List