| ??? 09/04/02 10:50 Read: times |
#28529 - RE: low cost CO2 gas sensor |
The conventional way to detect the absence (or litle quantity of) oxygen is a candle, instead of a canary. This avoids the animal sacrifice. However, I think the candle wastes more oxygen than the canary.
I am not an expert in gas detection, but I can imagine that measuring CO2 is not the same as measuring the absence of O2. BTW: How many food and oxygen does a middle-sized canary drain from the "power supply"?. Does it drain less current in the sleeping mode?. What peripherals remain active in this mode?. :-) Alfredo. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| low cost CO2 gas sensor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: low cost CO2 gas sensor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: low cost CO2 gas sensor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: low cost CO2 gas sensor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: low cost CO2 gas sensor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: low cost CO2 gas sensor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: low cost CO2 gas sensor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: low cost CO2 gas sensor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Again: low cost CO2 gas sensor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: low cost CO2 gas sensor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: The cheapest ;-) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Alfredo | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Alfredo | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Alfredo | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: low cost CO2 gas sensor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: low cost CO2 gas sensor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: low cost CO2 gas sensor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: low cost CO2 gas sensor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: low cost CO2 gas sensor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Chris | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Chris | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Chris | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: low cost CO2 gas sensor | 01/01/70 00:00 |



