| ??? 09/13/02 06:57 Read: times |
#29101 - RE: Delaying interrupts |
Erik, if things have names we can communicate better, can’t we?
I agree with you, if the application requires only message passing from a single interrupt you’ll not need a RTOS. It can be found a lot of examples even in olds BBS. But, if the application become more complex using of a RTOS helps you a lot (keep simplicity, maintenance …). On the other hand, I think it's not a good option to use a level interrupt for catching a 5 us event – what can be done in 5us with a 8051 at 12MHz (4us is required just to return from interrupt routine). We must also notify here that not only clearing/setting EA(ES…) are disabling the interrupts but other interrupts routine too. So, how to catch a 5us event if we don’t know when it arrives. (Pranav I do understand - that post was just an example – and it was good) |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Delaying interrupts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Delaying interrupts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Delaying interrupts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Delaying interrupts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Delaying interrupts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Delaying interrupts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Delaying interrupts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Delaying interrupts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Delaying interrupts Nic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Delaying interrupts Nic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Delaying interrupts Nic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Delaying interrupts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Delaying interrupts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Delaying interrupts, Nic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Delaying interrupts | 01/01/70 00:00 |



