| ??? 11/14/02 14:16 Read: times |
#32463 - RE: Electrical noise problem, Per |
I agree very much, that yuor '51 MUST be bypassed, both with a 100 nF ceramic and with 4.7 to 10 µF electrolytic cap, but why tantalums?
Aluminum, I am sure is fine, I just do not have the room for them and thus have not tested. "Put the thing in a steel box" Okay, but should'nt it also be a magnetic box? That is why it say "steel", not "metal" "Do not drive capacitive loads (like ribbon cables) directly from Uc outputs, buffer them with TTL or CMOS buffers (140-144)" What about using a pull up resistor. The datasheet for 80515 states that "high" is 2.4V with 80 µA behind it. Thats a verry high Z input. With a pull up in order of 5-10 K, (at Vcc 5v) you should be far better of. Yes, but a buffer can drive 50 mA and hold it against noise spikes, a resistor will allow noise to come through, just round and shorten the pulse. Also, adding a passive pullup will reduce the chips ability to "hold" a low. Ha' en rar dag Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Electrical noise problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Electrical noise problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Electrical noise problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Electrical noise problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Electrical noise problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Electrical noise problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Electrical noise problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Electrical noise problem, Per | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Electrical noise problem Per | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Electrical noise problem Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Electrical noise problem, Erik & Rob | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Electrical noise problem Per | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Electrical noise problem Per | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Electrical noise problem Per | 01/01/70 00:00 |



