erik malund wrote:
-------------------------------
There is NO reason to regenerate the 3rd, two will be identical until you write and at such time you will write 3 anyhow. If you, desperately, want to regenerate the 3rd, by all means go ahead.



Erik

With two idenital tables, when there is a update. update one of the tables and regenerate the first table. I'm left with two idenital tables. rt?

Is there any advantage to place one of the tables in code space rather then data mem?

Spencer