| ??? 11/27/02 16:08 Read: times |
#33293 - RE: 82c55 experienced ? |
mehmet,
search on this site an i think you will find the '8255 has been discussed to some length both parametrically and practically. two characteristics should be understood when using this part:
regards, p |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 82c55 experienced ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 82c55 experienced ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 82c55 experienced ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 82c55 experienced ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 82c55 experienced ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 82c55 experienced ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 82c55 experienced ? Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 82c55 experienced ? Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 82c55 experienced ? Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 |



