| ??? 12/10/02 12:52 Read: times |
#34132 - RE: Interrupt rate under Basic-52 |
Michael,
You are right, by using timer0 and timer1 some BASIC statements are lost (PWM,CLOCK...) This is well explained in the Intel User Manual. I'll measure the performance of my program and try to avoid a so frequent interrupt rate, as you suggest. Thanks |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Interrupt rate under Basic-52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Interrupt rate under Basic-52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Interrupt rate under Basic-52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Interrupt rate under Basic-52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Interrupt rate under Basic-52 | 01/01/70 00:00 |