| ??? 01/17/03 04:15 Read: times |
#36600 - RE: Memory models & Keil |
Erik wrote:
"you will still want your "heavy use" variables in (I)DATA for speed." Also for code size; accessing (I)DATA takes less code than accessing PDATA, and a lot less code than accessing XDATA! As I've mentioned before (possibly on the Keil forum), I recently worked on a Client Project where moving just one variable from XDATA to DATA gave several K-byte reduction in code size! Note that you can use the Keil uVision code browser to identify your most-frequently-used variables - these are prime targets for (I)DATA...! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Memory models & Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Memory models & Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Memory models & Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Memory models & Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Memory models & Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Memory models & Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Memory models & Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Memory models & Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Memory models & Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Keil Code (sic) Browser | 01/01/70 00:00 |



