| ??? 01/21/03 16:59 Read: times |
#36912 - RE: Problem with Function Pointers in Banks |
As you may have noted from my earlier posts I am not a fan of bankswitching (if 64k is not enough use another chip).
I do, however, read the posts on the subject (sometimes littlle nuggets of interest comes up) who knows, I may have to do it some day. Now for a question: Why are the banks 32k, not 64k. A lot less switching would be required. Just curious, Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Problem with Function Pointers in Banks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Problem with Function Pointers in Banks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Problem with Function Pointers in Banks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Problem with Function Pointers in Banks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Problem with Function Pointers in Banks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Problem with Function Pointers in Ba | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Problem with Function Pointers in Ba | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Problem with Function Pointers in Ba | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Problem with Function Pointers in Ba | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Func Pointers / fixed the wode post | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Problem with Function Pointers in Ba | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Problem with Function Pointers in Ba | 01/01/70 00:00 |



