??? 02/03/03 10:59 Read: times |
#38133 - RE: Need ASM51 Intel assembler Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik:
Thanks for the information. I agree at 99% with you: the compilation process is very fast and this makes a linker less important. However the two-step process (compiler + linker) is useful if you own a large library of object modules, but not the corresponding source files. It would be also useful for the integration of modules created using different programming languages. But, unfortunately, there is a lack of standards in this field and you often have to use a specific linker with a given compiler. Alfredo. |
Topic | Author | Date |
Need ASM51 Intel assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Need ASM51 Intel assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Need ASM51 Intel assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Need ASM51 Intel assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Need ASM51 Intel assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Need ASM51 Intel assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Need ASM51 Intel assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Need ASM51 Intel assembler(CARLOS) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Need ASM51 Intel assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Need ASM51 Intel assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Need ASM51 Intel assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Need ASM51 Intel assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Need ASM51 Intel assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Need ASM51 Intel assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Need ASM51 Intel assembler![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Need ASM51 Intel assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Need ASM51 Intel assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 |