| ??? 02/25/03 14:35 Read: times |
#40026 - RE: outw() Responding to: ???'s previous message |
"outw() -- for handling word."
Why would you want it? PC compilers (used to) have it because the x86 architecture has a separate IO space. So the so-called outportx() "functions" aren't really functions at all - just directive to get the compiler to use port IO instructions instead of memory accesses. On the 8052, everything is memory-mapped, so there is no need for any special constructs to access port IO. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| sdcc functions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: sdcc functions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: sdcc functions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: sdcc functions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: sdcc functions/pranav | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: sdcc functions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: outw() | 01/01/70 00:00 |



