Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
02/25/03 14:35
Read: times


 
#40026 - RE: outw()
Responding to: ???'s previous message
"outw() -- for handling word."

Why would you want it?

PC compilers (used to) have it because the x86 architecture has a separate IO space.
So the so-called outportx() "functions" aren't really functions at all - just directive to get the compiler to use port IO instructions instead of memory accesses.

On the 8052, everything is memory-mapped, so there is no need for any special constructs to access port IO.

List of 7 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
sdcc functions            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: sdcc functions            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: sdcc functions            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: sdcc functions            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: sdcc functions/pranav            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: sdcc functions            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: outw()            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List