Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
03/07/03 16:22
Read: times


 
#41036 - RE: 8052 and Polynomials
Responding to: ???'s previous message
MJK

That was quite useful and put the perspective of the C compiler in place. Yes I do have "bravely" gone through the grind of doing some extensive divide and multiply routines and had to debug for a week in one case - just because I wrote MOV R0, CHAN1 instead of MOV R0, #CHAN1. Compiles well but produces garbage. I will defenitley get back to you on the spread sheet stuff ...


JS

Yes converting to the frequency domain is a very good option to simplify things- but in this case I may not have to do that I suppose. Can be handled in the time domain..

BB

The transfer function is in a mess at this point as the full span of the variable cannot be fitted with a single curve and there is talk about two segments or more and the discussion sems to be heading for a look up table .

Thanks for all your time.

Raghu

List of 12 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
8052 and Polynomials            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: 8052 and Polynomials            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: 8052 and Polynomials            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: 8052 and Polynomials            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: 8052 and Polynomials            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: 8052 and Polynomials - Jerson            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: 8052 and Polynomials            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: 8052 and Polynomials Mike Karas            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: 8052 and Polynomials            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: 8052 and Polynomials            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: 8052 and Polynomials            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: 8052 and Polynomials            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List