| ??? 03/07/03 16:22 Read: times |
#41036 - RE: 8052 and Polynomials Responding to: ???'s previous message |
MJK
That was quite useful and put the perspective of the C compiler in place. Yes I do have "bravely" gone through the grind of doing some extensive divide and multiply routines and had to debug for a week in one case - just because I wrote MOV R0, CHAN1 instead of MOV R0, #CHAN1. Compiles well but produces garbage. I will defenitley get back to you on the spread sheet stuff ... JS Yes converting to the frequency domain is a very good option to simplify things- but in this case I may not have to do that I suppose. Can be handled in the time domain.. BB The transfer function is in a mess at this point as the full span of the variable cannot be fitted with a single curve and there is talk about two segments or more and the discussion sems to be heading for a look up table . Thanks for all your time. Raghu |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 8052 and Polynomials | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8052 and Polynomials | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8052 and Polynomials | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8052 and Polynomials | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8052 and Polynomials | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8052 and Polynomials - Jerson | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8052 and Polynomials | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8052 and Polynomials Mike Karas | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8052 and Polynomials | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 8052 and Polynomials | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8052 and Polynomials | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8052 and Polynomials | 01/01/70 00:00 |



