??? 03/13/03 20:43 Read: times |
#41464 - RE: coverage analysis Responding to: ???'s previous message |
if you are looking for coverage analysis ... the coverage analysis on the Keil simulator doesn't work very well (the output is not useful). at least it wasn't a few years ago. at that time, i looked at the ACEbus simulator and Craig's Pinnacle52 simulator (actually i asked them about it). neither of them had coverage analysis then, but they both offered to look into it. i didn't follow up, so i don't know if they added it. i wound up hacking at Daniel Drotos' s51 (?) simulator (he publishes the source) to get it to output the current address at each program step to a file. i used gawk to filter this output to produce a coverage report for each module (showing covered and uncovered lines of code, and summary counts). i don't have any of this stuff, it's with my old employer. but if AceBus or Pinnacle52 haven't added coverage analysis, you might start there. james |
Topic | Author | Date |
testing 8051code on a pc | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: testing 8051code on a pc | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: testing 8051code on a pc | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: testing 8051code on a pc (JSIM.EXE) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: testing 8051code on a pc Pinnacle 52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: testing 8051code on a pc Pinnacle 52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: testing 8051code on a pc Pinnacle 52![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: testing 8051code on a pc | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: testing 8051code on a pc | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: testing 8051code on a pc | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: coverage analysis | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Keil coverage analysis | 01/01/70 00:00 |