Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
08/07/00 10:58
Read: times


 
#4196 - RE: Mystic switch()/"Address space overflow&a
Hi, Peter,

Of course, such argument passing makes an automatic dissasembling of
code as impossible. There whould not be to do something for the
criminals to crack code, if all done by de-translator. I think just
a very big, dramaticaly not effective code might suspend them.

But, what's the connection with a crazy disassembler and program running
under ICE control? I think it is not importent, how is a byte interpreted
at a disassembler window, as a data, or a code. Mostly, all the data
fields are interpreted as code at disassembler window, but these fields
are never executed by CPU.

I feel I am not enough experienced with ICE emulation concept. Why, an
emulator's decision must be based on a disassembler, and not on a next
instruction to execute, while "Step" mode?

Thanks,
Oleg

List of 5 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Mystic switch()/"Address space overflow"            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Mystic switch()/"Address space overflow&q            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Mystic switch()/"Address space overflow&a            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Mystic switch()/"Address space overflow&q            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Mystic switch()/"Address space overflow&a            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List