| ??? 04/12/03 02:40 Read: times |
#43302 - RC5.RC6?- Sam & Charles Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Those were interesting remarks.
While I do not want to join issue I still would like to point out that such sharp critisicm does have its plus points. It certainly does instill plenty of caution to the person who looks for a real solution. And to post responsibily. I myself have got so many tricky issues sorted out, thanks to the forum. Even with this kind of "self moderation" you still find so many postings that are vague, off-topic, and repeat in nature. Like Charles said, if you are focussed, you can get what you want finally. And you learn how to ask the next time. Raghu |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| which brand is RC5.RC6? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: which brand is RC5.RC6? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: which brand is RC5.RC6? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: which brand is RC5.RC6? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: which brand is RC5.RC6? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: which brand is RC5.RC6? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: which brand is RC5.RC6? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: which brand is RC5.RC6? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: which brand is RC5.RC6? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: which brand is RC5.RC6? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: which brand is RC5.RC6? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: which brand is RC5.RC6? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: which brand is RC5.RC6? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: which brand is RC5.RC6? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RC5.RC6?- Sam & Charles | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: which brand is RC5.RC6? | 01/01/70 00:00 |



