| ??? 05/22/03 07:57 Read: times |
#46350 - RE: - Abhishek Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Abhishek -
I guessed that he would be using assembly, and hoped the signal period would fall within the range of a single 16-bit timer overflow. My approach would not need any greater-than or less-than comparison to code in assembly, so I thought it might be easier to implement. Your pulsewidth measurement approach, followed by a comparison against a threshold value is a better approach. I suppose if the pulsewidth is a multibyte value, you could simply check the highest byte. That would probably give adequate resolution for an app like this and is easy to code. - Lee |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Measuring frequency using 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Measuring frequency using 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Measuring frequency using 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Measuring frequency using 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: - Abhishek | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: - Abhishek | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Measuring frequency using 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Measuring frequency using 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks a lot.. | 01/01/70 00:00 |



