Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
05/25/03 04:04
Read: times


 
#46580 - RE: AT89Cx051 programming questions
Responding to: ???'s previous message
After some tests I determined that I have to insert a 2.5ms break after powering up the chip before programming the first byte. Why should that be nescessary?

As long as I don't know more about your circuit, I can only guess: There can be some time 'constants' in your ciruit, needing this few milliseconds. Another guess: When using built-in oscillator in combination with quartz, mcu is allowed to need some milliseconds for stabilizing. May be that mcu needs this time for some other stuff, also? Sometimes in datasheet such a minimum time needed for being ready for programming after power-up is specified. I cannot remember where I saw this, but I did.
It's a only a feeling, but I would insert even a longer break for stabilizing: Something arround 10...20msec.

Bye,
Kai

List of 7 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
AT89Cx051 programming questions            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: AT89Cx051 programming questions            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: AT89Cx051 programming questions            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: AT89Cx051 programming questions            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: AT89Cx051 programming questions            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: AT89Cx051 programming questions            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: AT89Cx051 programming questions            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List