Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/14/03 06:04
Read: times


 
#48356 - RE: c=SBUF; what's going wrong?
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Hi,

I agree with david. Using the uVision debugger this way puts it in the trans-buffer only instead of the recv-buffer; and you are definitely right about Keil's documentation.

kodi

List of 11 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
c=SBUF; what's going wrong?            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: c=SBUF; what\'s going wrong?            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: c=SBUF; what\'s going wrong?            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: c=SBUF; what\'s going wrong?            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: c=SBUF; what's going wrong?            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: c=SBUF; what's going wrong?            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: c=SBUF; what's going wrong?            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: c=SBUF; what's going wrong?            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: c=SBUF; what's going wrong?            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: c=SBUF; what's going wrong?            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: c=SBUF; what's going wrong?            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List