| ??? 06/18/03 16:24 Read: times |
#48738 - RE: It\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik,
I agree with you too. That's pretty much what I was trying to imply in the first paragraph of my previous post. Just wanted to stress that the ISR=KISS rule is a good one, just to avoid that some poor soul that desperately wanted to believe your second paragraph getting in trouble. After all we have to remember the mix of participants in this forum and The originator of this thread clearly indicates that ISR=KISS is the way for him to go. Dear friends, I am not saying anyone is stupid, I just recall all the messes I made when I started and all the messes I have had to get starters (and some so called experienced) out of. We all have to crawl before we can walk, some accept that fact, some don't. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Keil and recursive warning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil and recursive warning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil and recursive warning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil and recursive warning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil and recursive warning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It\'s Manual-Reading Time! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: It\\\'s Manual-Reading Time! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: It\\\'s Manual-Reading Time! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: It\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s Manual-Rea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: It\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s Manual-Rea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: It\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ | 01/01/70 00:00 |



