| ??? 06/21/03 09:58 Read: times |
#48963 - RE: WDT bigger timeout Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Use a slower crystal !
I don't think the WDT is the ideal element to use Mahmood. You're better using another timer process, supervisd of course overall by the WDT, this will allow the supervisory process to do more than just reset the CPU. Steve |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| WDT bigger timeout | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: WDT bigger timeout | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: WDT bigger timeout | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: WDT bigger timeout | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: WDT bigger timeout | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: WDT bigger timeout | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: WDT bigger timeout | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: WDT bigger timeout | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: WDT bigger timeout | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: WDT bigger timeout | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: WDT bigger timeout | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: WDT bigger timeout | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: WDT bigger timeout | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: WDT bigger timeout | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: WDT bigger timeout | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: WDT bigger timeout | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: why no 555 | 01/01/70 00:00 |