| ??? 07/04/03 20:25 Read: times |
#50087 - RE: 16-bit keyscan to 4-bit Responding to: ???'s previous message |
The code that Rob linked in his post is an option for you to consider. It offers a slightly different approach in that the multiple key pressed idea is ignored and replaced with the idea that each key in the matrix has a priority and the routine will report the key with the highest priority in the case of multiple keys pressed. The scanning algorithm uses a table lookup scheme so that this priority order can be determined at will just by re-ordering the rows in the table.
I have used this scheme many times, but it is not the ideal key scanning algorithm to use under several considerations....
Good Luck Michael Karas |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 16-bit keyscan to 4-bit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 16-bit keyscan to 4-bit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 16-bit keyscan to 4-bit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 16-bit keyscan to 4-bit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 16-bit keyscan to 4-bit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 16-bit keyscan to 4-bit | 01/01/70 00:00 |



