| ??? 07/06/03 20:18 Read: times |
#50175 - RE: 89S8252 and RTC 72421 Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Robert:
The best choice for the CS1 control is to find a suitable detector chip. Maxim has quite a number of parts to choose from. The MAX690 is a nice chip but much too expensive for this application. You can find other parts in their lineup that cost about 1/10 as much. Your circuit with the 1K resistor and 10uF capacitor is not suitable. Maybe instead you could try this circuit while you wait for a good chip to arrive.
+5V --+--------+
| |
| X
X X 10K
X X
X |
| +---------- CS1
| |/
+------| NPN
| |
--- V
Vz=4.7V / |
--- |
| |
| |
----- -----
--- ---
- -For the power supply switch over I would use the type of circuit recommended in the data sheet. I.E. the one showing the PNP and NPN transistors. It is not the best to put a diode in series with the 5V supply to the RTC chip because the chip is then only running on 4.3 volts during I/Os and may not interface correctly via its bus lines. The PNP switch allows the VCC or the RTC chip to get right up to within 0.1 volts of the +5V rail.
I would think that a 0.1uF capacitor on the VCC line should be OK but 1 uF or 10 uF would work too as long as you choose one with very low leakage, as this capacitor ends up being a load on your battery (and a low quality capacitor could drain your battery faster than the RTC chip). If you do not mind the non-rechargable battery then the Li battery is a better choice. Using a NiCad rechargable with just a series resistor to charge it is a bad solution because there is no way to prevent over charging the NiCad in this configuration. For sure you will see plenty of second rate products that use a NiCad like that I would be hard pressed to recommend it. MICHAEL KARAS |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 89S8252 and RTC 72421 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89S8252 and RTC 72421 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89S8252 and RTC 72421 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89S8252 and RTC 72421 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89S8252 and RTC 72421 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89S8252 and RTC 72421 / Try Again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89S8252 and RTC 72421 / Try Again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89S8252 and RTC 72421 / Try Again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89S8252 and RTC 72421 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89S8252 and RTC 72421 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89S8252 and RTC 72421 | 01/01/70 00:00 |



