Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
09/16/03 07:33
Read: times


 
#54795 - RE: Clarification required - Suresh!
Responding to: ???'s previous message
and searched also. Andy is right linked lists are eficient in dynamic manipulation like insertion and deletion, but in your original post problem was with too much searching time and thats where linked lists are inefficient.


indexing may be option, but memory overhead and index maintanence overhead is there. if you can afford it you can go for it. other wise hashing is an good option.


abhishek

List of 18 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
storing strings on flash            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: storing strings on flash            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: storing strings on flash            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: storing strings on flash            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: storing strings on flash            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: storing strings on flash            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: storing strings on flash            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: storing strings on flash            01/01/70 00:00      
         Clarification required - Suresh!            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Clarification required - Suresh!            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Clarification required - Suresh!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Clarification required - Suresh!            01/01/70 00:00      
                     clarified            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Clarification required - Suresh!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Clarification required - Suresh!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  problem in detailed            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: problem in detailed            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: storing strings on flash            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List