| ??? 09/24/03 18:18 Read: times |
#55392 - RE: Goes to AT89S51 / AT89S52: Kai Klaas Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I will not give here a guarantee, but AT89S51 is recommended by the manufacturer for future use instead of AT89C51.
Atmel has become very, very rich with AT89C51, and you can assume that Atmel will not leave the market, now. So, they will always have some derivative being compatible to 'good old' AT89C51. Kai |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| What if not 8951 / 8952 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: What if not 8951 / 8952 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: What if not 8951 / 8952 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: What if not 8951 / 8952 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: What if not 8951 / 8952 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: What if not 8951 / 8952 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: What if not 8951 / 8952 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Goes to AT89S51 / AT89S52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Goes to AT89S51 / AT89S52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: // Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: // Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Goes to AT89S51 / AT89S52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Goes to AT89S51 / AT89S52: Kai Klaas | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Goes to AT89S51 / AT89S52: Kai Klaas | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Goes to AT89S51 / AT89S52: Kai Klaas | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: What if not 8951 / 8952 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: What if not 8951 / 8952 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: What if not 8951 / 8952 | 01/01/70 00:00 |