| ??? 10/16/03 14:36 Read: times |
#56758 - RE: Why DIP? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Why specifically DIP?
Nobody can, today, with any succes, stick to DIP. Most modern devices are simply not available in that package. The irony is that as out eyes goes weaker, the chips go smaller. I wonder what todays "kids" (anyone under 30) will "see" (I doubt they can) when they enter adulthood. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 2x 8bit ADC to make 1x16bit ADC? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 2x 8bit ADC to make 1x16bit ADC? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 2x 8bit ADC to make 1x16bit ADC? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 2x 8bit ADC to make 1x16bit ADC? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 2x 8bit ADC to make 1x16bit ADC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 2x 8bit ADC to make 1x16bit ADC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 2x 8bit ADC to make 1x16bit ADC? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 2x 8bit ADC to make 1x16bit ADC? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 2x 8bit ADC to make 1x16bit ADC? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 2x 8bit ADC to make 1x16bit ADC? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 2x 8bit ADC to make 1x16bit ADC? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why DIP? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Why DIP? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| used 16 bits timer only | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Why DIP? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Why DIP? | 01/01/70 00:00 |