Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
10/27/03 21:39
Read: times


 
#57357 - RE: Code development
Responding to: ???'s previous message
"What you usually end up having to roll in your own is some methodology for doing code download, test and debugging."

OK - I see what you mean.

"Now I suppose that a Cygnal style JTAG debugging system with hardware breakpoints, watch points, register & memory sniffing, and single step and reset control is available from some where as IP it is yet another piece to buy, design in, and get working."

Hmmm - do any of these cores come with all that ready built in?

There's a page on the Keil site about support for various "cores" - haven't really looked into it.

"We cannot also forget the more generic types of chips such as Cygnal and Triscend have on board FLASH"

Unfortunately, Triscend don't do on-chip Flash. :-(
That's why Steve hates 'em

List of 12 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
FPGA Core outperforms 8051...            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: FPGA Core outperforms 8051...            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: FPGA Core outperforms 8051...            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: FPGA Core outperforms 8051...            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: FPGA Core outperforms 8051...            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: FPGA Core outperforms 8051...            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Code development            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Code development            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: Code development            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: When to use an FPGA Core?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Baloney            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: FPGA Core outperforms 8051...            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List