Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
11/18/03 15:21
Read: times


 
#58915 - RE: Using Direct Memory Addresses
Responding to: ???'s previous message
need a couple more flag locations to run my program. I was using PSW.1 and PSW.5 on the 552, but judging from my (lack of) results that doesn't seem like a great idea now. PCON.2 and PCON.3 also appear available (General Purpose Flags) but they, too, seem to be getting disrupted as the program runs.

Can I just choose upper memory locations and use them as flags instead, like "SETB 07EH" ?? Is that an acceptable method, or are there flag bits somewhere else I don't know about?

C compilers tend to like the flagbits you are referring to since they are not supposed to be known by C programmers. That is probably the reason you have problems retaining them. on that subject, I would be surprised if some of these were not derivative dependent.

You can only use SETB for the bit area and SFRs xx0 and xx8
Why not a byte flag ) or not?.

Erik



List of 10 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Using Direct Memory Addresses            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Using Direct Memory Addresses            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Using Direct Memory Addresses            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Using Direct Memory Addresses            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Using Direct Memory Addresses            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Using Direct Memory Addresses            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Using Direct Memory Addresses            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Using Direct Memory Addresses            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Using Direct Memory Addresses            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: why,oh why            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List