| ??? 01/19/04 09:27 Read: times |
#62868 - RE: Keil software - stack question Responding to: ???'s previous message |
But its damned unlikely, that the program returns to the main, if the stack was crashed.
So the better place to test the stack was a timer interrupt, which test, if SP is always above STACK_START+1. On derivates with only 128 bytes SRAM an additional test, that SP below 0x80 must be done. Peter |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Keil software - stack question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil software - stack question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil software - stack question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil software - stack question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil software - stack question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: stack pertubation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: To Dan Henry - stack question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: To Dan Henry - stack question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: To Dan Henry - stack question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: To Dan Henry - stack question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil software - stack question | 01/01/70 00:00 |



