??? 01/25/04 22:17 Read: times |
#63329 - RE: FAT16 C code for 80c52 and variants Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hi Michael,
That seems reasonable for higher volume applications, breaking even at around 12,500 units when compared to Microsoft's US$0.25 per unit license fee. Although if that was HCC's licensing arrangement back in October, one has to wonder if it has changed since Microsoft's December 2003 decision to pursue that licencing strategy. -- Dan Henry |
Topic | Author | Date |
FAT16 C code for 80c52 and variants | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: FAT16 C code for 80c52 and variants | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: FAT16 C code for 80c52 and variants | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: FAT16 C code for 80c52 and variants | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: FAT16 C code for 80c52 and variants | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: FAT16 C code for 80c52 and variants | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: FAT16 C code for 80c52 and variants | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: FAT16 C code for 80c52 and variants | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: FAT16 C code for 80c52 and variants | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: FAT16 C code for 80c52 and variants | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: FAT16 C code for 80c52 and variants | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: FAT16 C code for 80c52 and variants | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: FAT16 C code for 80c52 and variants | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: FAT16 C code for 80c52 and variants | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: FAT16 C code for 80c52 and variants![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |