| ??? 01/26/04 17:41 Read: times |
#63372 - RE: buffering I/O against damage Responding to: ???'s previous message |
paul mcdowell wrote:
------------------------------- would optoisolation protect the I/0 from shorts and any other possible problems. Well it depends where you think the problems will come from. If you are debugging a board with a processor and no "real world" I/O, then the buffers I described will at least protect the CPU. If you have lots of real world I/O, with switchng cruft etc etc etc, then optos are a possibility. Good, clean, Fast optical switching though is not particularly cheap or easy per pin. But as Jacob says, you really can't beat sockets ! Unless you are using high precision A/D D/A type things Steve |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| buffering I/O against damage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: buffering I/O against damage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: buffering I/O against damage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: buffering I/O against damage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: buffering I/O against damage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: buffering I/O against damage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: buffering I/O against damage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: buffering I/O against damage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: buffering I/O against damage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: buffering I/O against damage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: buffering I/O against damage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: buffering I/O against damage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: buffering I/O against damage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: buffering I/O against damage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: buffering I/O against damage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: buffering I/O against damage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: buffering I/O against damage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: buffering I/O against damage | 01/01/70 00:00 |



