| ??? 01/27/04 15:32 Read: times |
#63421 - RE: Take care on AT89C51CC03 Errata Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Once with a very early Atmel chip I reported a problem when the revision was in the neighbourhood of 'g'. Atmel vehemently denied that the problem existed, but lo and behold, about a year later it came out in an errata and was fixed in a revision about 's'.
I totally understand that there is no way in hades that each and evey permutation of a chip can be verified by the makers so asking for a first run perfect chip is not reasonable. What we CAN ask for, however is errata being released the very moment a problem is known. This also known as basic honesty. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Take care on AT89C51CC03 Errata | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Take care on AT89C51CC03 Errata | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Take care on AT89C51CC03 Errata | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Take care on AT89C51CC03 Errata | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Take care on AT89C51CC03 Errata | 01/01/70 00:00 |



