| ??? 02/05/04 14:07 Read: times |
#64072 - RE: Decreamenting DPTR. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I don't think that the decrement DPTR is missing simply because of the space,the increase in size of the instruction decoder would have been minimal.Maybe they didnt see a need for it. a routine which needs to decrement a pointer can probably always be transformed into one which uses an incrementing pointer. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Decreamenting DPTR. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Decreamenting DPTR. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Decreamenting DPTR. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Decreamenting DPTR. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Decreamenting DPTR. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Decreamenting DPTR. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Decreamenting DPTR. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Decreamenting DPTR. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Decreamenting DPTR. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Decreamenting DPTR. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Decreamenting DPTR. | 01/01/70 00:00 |



