??? 03/27/04 01:29 Read: times |
#67480 - RE: Because its just a SIMULATOR! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Andy Neil wrote:
------------------------------- erik malund said:
My guess is that you do not specify your xtal frequency in the simulator to be what your xtal is. Nope. That will make no difference at all. The Keil simulator does NOT attempt to get the PC to run the code at the same speed that an 8051 would - and there is no real reason why it should. The only use of the XTAL setting is to allow the simulator to convert numbers of cycles to times when it displays them. If you need to investigate real timings, you need to do it on real hardware. I AM ACOLLEG STUDENT IN ELECTRONIC AND I NEED SIMULATOR FOR FINAL PROJECT 8951 OR 8051 THANKS FOR EVERY THING |
Topic | Author | Date |
delay length on keil? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: delay length on keil? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Because its just a SIMULATOR! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Because its just a SIMULATOR! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Because its just a SIMULATOR! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Because its just a SIMULATOR! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Because its just a SIMULATOR! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ARSAM SOLIMANY | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: delay length on keil? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: delay length on keil?![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |